Saturday, February 27, 2010

Migration and objective change

Migration brings ideology, culture and skills and practices that there are various forms of remittances ranging from social, economic to cultural and political remittances. However, I am not sure, how it brings changes in the subjective experience of the people involved but it brings changes at least in economic and objective sense. And I do not agree that it dilutes the migrating community. I think it should be seen under the framework of globalization where time and space matters. There is nothing static in this world so there is no any society which would be diluted by migration. Migration brings changes but it depends upon response and resilience of the local people. So I think, there is no dilution but it is the change that has been taking place by migration. And change always comes through the friction/fusion of ideas; contestation of ideas gives rise to the emergence of 'new' knowledge which of course not a pollution or dilution.
I would be happy to discuss more on the issues of migration, labour migration, left-behind and their livelihood and wellbeing.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

We can improve agriculture sector in Nepal: tips for IAASAA conference 2010

In the IAASAA listserve I found an interesting thought on the family background and the intended education. The context was the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science Alumni Association (IAASAA)'s forthcoming conference going to be held in Rampur, Chitwan Nepal. By reading those two emails in this thread I would also like to take part in the discussion. However, I am not going to give another SAD story because I don't think that it is the matter of family background. It is rather, I think, due to an individual's interest, if not due to the flaws in curriculum. Very good overview of students' family background as well as the urban rural divide. However, I would like to make some comments in these thoughts;
1. I don't think that it is necessary to have a family background in farming to study agriculture because if that happens is it possible to have admission in MBBS only from the doctors' families? What about engineers and so on? Who is going to study forestry? Who is going to study the molecular genetics and space engineering? Or whatever, you see!! Don't you think that it is going to be a big mess if we think like this. I rather think that it is the matter of interest of an individual (student) and his person goal in life, which sector s/he would like to follow in life. That counts rather than his background because that is where the education comes. If one has not seen a potato plant before the curriculum has to be so developed that s/he would able to understand what it is.
2. Another important thing is a kind of targeting failure. Trying to pose as if a person of the similar background would help to enhance the sector after study. Alright! Very commendable! That is fine if happened so but can we be honest? How many of us from farming background are working back on our own community? I can bet if 5% does so.

I would like to raise some points for discussion in the IAASAA convention/conference:
1. How to make IAAS free (at least minimize the effect) from politics?
2. Coordinated actions among the government apparatus on education, research and extension. Nothing an alone brihaspati can do; networking and coordinated action. Nothing for junga ko ladain but needs a collective action if to change in this sector.
3. How do we handle the issues of climate change and food security in a situation of growing food demand?

4. How to regain the labor force back in agriculture from a situation of rapidly increasing labor out-migration. Can we ever think of becoming a labor importing country? Exporting labor is doing something for others but not for us.

I wish a pleasant, joyful and fruitful conference.

Thanks.

Hom